You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social marketing including financial incentive programs at worksite cafeterias for preventing obesity: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-0965-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kimi Sawada, Koji Wada, Sadequa Shahrook, Erika Ota, Yukari Takemi, Rintaro Mori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 8 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 49 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,961,399
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#319
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,880
of 354,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#11
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.