You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making microbiology of the built environment relevant to design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-016-0152-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Z. Brown, Jeff Kline, Gwynne Mhuireach, Dale Northcutt, Jason Stenson |
| Abstract |
Architects are enthusiastic about "bioinformed design" as occupant well-being is a primary measure of architectural success. However, architects are also under mounting pressure to create more sustainable buildings. Scientists have a critical opportunity to make the emerging field of microbiology of the built environment more relevant and applicable to real-world design problems by addressing health and sustainability in tandem. Practice-based research, which complements evidence-based design, represents a promising approach to advancing knowledge of the indoor microbiome and translating it to architectural practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 35% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Engineering | 9 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Design | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,757,831
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#667
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,044
of 303,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.