↓ Skip to main content

One-stage or two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection – the INFORM trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-stage or two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection – the INFORM trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1213-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Strange, Michael R. Whitehouse, Andrew D. Beswick, Tim Board, Amanda Burston, Ben Burston, Fran E. Carroll, Paul Dieppe, Kirsty Garfield, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Stephen Jones, Setor Kunutsor, Athene Lane, Erik Lenguerrand, Alasdair MacGowan, Andrew Moore, Sian Noble, Joanne Simon, Ian Stockley, Adrian H. Taylor, Andrew Toms, Jason Webb, John-Paul Whittaker, Matthew Wilson, Vikki Wylde, Ashley W. Blom

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects approximately 1 % of patients following total hip replacement (THR) and often results in severe physical and emotional suffering. Current surgical treatment options are debridement, antibiotics and implant retention; revision THR; excision of the joint and amputation. Revision surgery can be done as either a one-stage or two-stage operation. Both types of surgery are well-established practice in the NHS and result in similar rates of re-infection, but little is known about the impact of these treatments from the patient's perspective. The main aim of this randomised controlled trial is to determine whether there is a difference in patient-reported outcome measures 18 months after randomisation for one-stage or two-stage revision surgery. INFORM (INFection ORthopaedic Management) is an open, two-arm, multi-centre, randomised, superiority trial. We aim to randomise 148 patients with eligible PJI of the hip from approximately seven secondary care NHS orthopaedic units from across England and Wales. Patients will be randomised via a web-based system to receive either a one-stage revision or a two-stage revision THR. Blinding is not possible due to the nature of the intervention. All patients will be followed up for 18 months. The primary outcome is the WOMAC Index, which assesses hip pain, function and stiffness, collected by questionnaire at 18 months. Secondary outcomes include the following: cost-effectiveness, complications, re-infection rates, objective hip function assessment and quality of life. A nested qualitative study will explore patients' and surgeons' experiences, including their views about trial participation and randomisation. INFORM is the first ever randomised trial to compare two widely accepted surgical interventions for the treatment of PJI: one-stage and two-stage revision THR. The results of the trial will benefit patients in the future as the main focus is on patient-reported outcomes: pain, function and wellbeing in the long term. Patients state that these outcomes are more important than those that are clinically derived (such as re-infection) and have been commonly used in previous non-randomised studies. Results from the INFORM trial will also benefit clinicians and NHS managers by enabling the comparison of these key interventions in terms of patients' complication rates, health and social resource use and their overall cost-effectiveness. Current controlled trials ISRCTN10956306 (registered on 29 January 2015); UKCRN ID 18159.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 60 35%