↓ Skip to main content

Clustering in surgical trials - database of intracluster correlations

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clustering in surgical trials - database of intracluster correlations
Published in
Trials, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan A Cook, Thomas Bruckner, Graeme S MacLennan, Christoph M Seiler

Abstract

Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 46%
Mathematics 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%