You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent efforts to elucidate the scientific validity of animal-based drug tests by the pharmaceutical industry, pro-testing lobby groups, and animal welfare organisations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0352-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jarrod Bailey, Michael Balls |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 25% |
| Unknown | 45 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,440,933
of 24,843,842 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#108
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,467
of 360,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,843,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.