You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Web-based personalised information and support for patients with a neuroendocrine tumour: randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-019-1035-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. D. de Hosson, G. Bouma, J. Stelwagen, H. van Essen, G. H. de Bock, D. J. A. de Groot, E. G. E. de Vries, A. M. E. Walenkamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 18% |
Psychology | 9 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,384,768
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#764
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,458
of 367,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.