↓ Skip to main content

Inexperienced clinicians can extract pathoanatomic information from MRI narrative reports with high reproducibility for use in research/quality assurance

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inexperienced clinicians can extract pathoanatomic information from MRI narrative reports with high reproducibility for use in research/quality assurance
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-19-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kent, Andrew M Briggs, Hanne B Albert, Andreas Byrhagen, Christian Hansen, Karina Kjaergaard, Tue S Jensen

Abstract

Although reproducibility in reading MRI images amongst radiologists and clinicians has been studied previously, no studies have examined the reproducibility of inexperienced clinicians in extracting pathoanatomic information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) narrative reports and transforming that information into quantitative data. However, this process is frequently required in research and quality assurance contexts. The purpose of this study was to examine inter-rater reproducibility (agreement and reliability) among an inexperienced group of clinicians in extracting spinal pathoanatomic information from radiologist-generated MRI narrative reports.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Psychology 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Computer Science 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%