You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors in a systematic review: a case study and worked example
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0685-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Cooper, Juan Talens Bou, Jo Varley-Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 35% |
Ireland | 5 | 25% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
Scientists | 7 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
Librarian | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,831,205
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#252
of 2,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,025
of 353,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.