↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cell Biology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Cell Biology, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2121-6-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salman Rahman, Yatin Patel, Jacqueline Murray, Kirti V Patel, Rushika Sumathipala, Michael Sobel, Errol S Wijelath

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 35%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Engineering 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,585,824
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cell Biology
#78
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,371
of 140,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cell Biology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.