↓ Skip to main content

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,296)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
97 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia Superchi, José Antonio González, Ivan Solà, Erik Cobo, Darko Hren, Isabelle Boutron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#651,521
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#49
of 2,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,130
of 366,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.