You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of coconut water and a carbohydrate-electrolyte sport drink on measures of hydration and physical performance in exercise-trained men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas S Kalman, Samantha Feldman, Diane R Krieger, Richard J Bloomer |
| Abstract |
Sport drinks are ubiquitous within the recreational and competitive fitness and sporting world. Most are manufactured and artificially flavored carbohydrate-electrolyte beverages. Recently, attention has been given to coconut water, a natural alternative to manufactured sport drinks, with initial evidence indicating efficacy with regard to maintaining hydration. We compared coconut water and a carbohydrate-electrolyte sport drink on measures of hydration and physical performance in exercise-trained men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 13% |
| Canada | 9 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 7% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Saint Martin (French part) | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 28% |
| Scientists | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 75 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 86 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 677. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#31,653
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#17
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,061
of 449,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#17
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.