↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of selected human rights programs to improve HIV-related outcomes from 2003 to 2015: what do we know?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of selected human rights programs to improve HIV-related outcomes from 2003 to 2015: what do we know?
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-3692-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne L. Stangl, Devaki Singh, Michael Windle, Kirsty Sievwright, Katherine Footer, Alexandrina Iovita, Stella Mukasa, Stefan Baral

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 52 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Psychology 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 55 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,259,840
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,004
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,338
of 354,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#74
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.