↓ Skip to main content

Impact of team configuration and team stability on primary care quality

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of team configuration and team stability on primary care quality
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0864-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvia J. Hysong, Amber B. Amspoker, Ashley M. Hughes, Lechauncy Woodard, Frederick L. Oswald, Laura A. Petersen, Houston F. Lester

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 40 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 41 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,132,308
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#806
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,389
of 353,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.