You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of MAGNet, a long-lasting insecticidal mosquito net against Anopheles fluviatilis in experimental huts in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2692-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunasekaran Kasinathan, Sudhansu Sekhar Sahu, Vijayakumar Tharmalingam, Subramanian Swaminathan, Manju Rahi, Jambulingam Purushothaman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,413,000
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,001
of 5,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,874
of 352,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#94
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.