You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling causes of death: an integrated approach using CODEm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Health Metrics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7954-10-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyle J Foreman, Rafael Lozano, Alan D Lopez, Christopher JL Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Colombia | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#99
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,527
of 249,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them