↓ Skip to main content

Differing clinical characteristics between influenza strains among young healthy adults in the tropics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differing clinical characteristics between influenza strains among young healthy adults in the tropics
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Yap, Chi Hsien Tan, Alex R Cook, Jin Phang Loh, Paul A Tambyah, Boon Huan Tan, Vernon J Lee

Abstract

Influenza infections may result in different clinical presentations. This study aims to determine the clinical differences between circulating influenza strains in a young healthy adult population in the tropics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,428
of 7,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,974
of 246,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#40
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.