↓ Skip to main content

Slow saccades in cerebellar disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebellum & Ataxias, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Slow saccades in cerebellar disease
Published in
Cerebellum & Ataxias, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40673-018-0095-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Jensen, Sinem Balta Beylergil, Aasef G. Shaikh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,557,521
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Cerebellum & Ataxias
#89
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,678
of 438,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebellum & Ataxias
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.