↓ Skip to main content

An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Shakeshaft, Dennis Petrie, Christopher Doran, Courtney Breen, Robert Sanson-Fisher

Abstract

Given limited research evidence for community-based alcohol interventions, this study examines the intervention preferences of rural communities and alcohol professionals, and factors that influence their choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,153,989
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,786
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,247
of 243,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#185
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.