You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the mechanism and principles of management of temporomandibular joint dislocation. Systematic review of literature and a proposed new classification of temporomandibular joint dislocation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Head & Face Medicine, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-160x-7-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Babatunde O Akinbami |
| Abstract |
Virtually all the articles in literature addressed only a specific type of dislocation. The aim of this review was to project a comprehensive understanding of the pathologic processes and management of all types of dislodgement of the head of the mandibular condyle from its normal position in the glenoid fossa. In addition, a new classification of temporomandibular joint dislocation was also proposed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 66% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2012.
All research outputs
#18,303,566
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#184
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,053
of 113,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them