You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genome of lethal Lepiota venenata and insights into the evolution of toxin-biosynthetic genes
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12864-019-5575-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yunjiao Lüli, Qing Cai, Zuo H. Chen, Hu Sun, Xue-Tai Zhu, Xuan Li, Zhu L. Yang, Hong Luo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,274,938
of 24,219,576 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#227
of 10,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,410
of 356,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#7
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,219,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.