↓ Skip to main content

Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS—aspects of interrater agreement

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS—aspects of interrater agreement
Published in
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41512-019-0050-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten, Elena Tseli, Björn Olov Äng, Katja Boersma, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Björn Gerdle, Paul Enthoven

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,102,421
of 14,669,073 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#16
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,076
of 264,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,669,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them