↓ Skip to main content

De novo and inherited TCF20 pathogenic variants are associated with intellectual disability, dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and neurological impairments with similarities to Smith–Magenis syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo and inherited TCF20 pathogenic variants are associated with intellectual disability, dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and neurological impairments with similarities to Smith–Magenis syndrome
Published in
Genome Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13073-019-0623-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Vetrini, Shane McKee, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Mohnish Suri, Andrea M. Lewis, Kimberly Margaret Nugent, Elizabeth Roeder, Rebecca O. Littlejohn, Sue Holder, Wenmiao Zhu, Joseph T. Alaimo, Brett Graham, Jill M. Harris, James B. Gibson, Matthew Pastore, Kim L. McBride, Makanko Komara, Lihadh Al-Gazali, Aisha Al Shamsi, Elizabeth A. Fanning, Klaas J. Wierenga, Daryl A. Scott, Ziva Ben-Neriah, Vardiella Meiner, Hanoch Cassuto, Orly Elpeleg, J. Lloyd Holder, Lindsay C. Burrage, Laurie H. Seaver, Lionel Van Maldergem, Sonal Mahida, Janet S. Soul, Margaret Marlatt, Ludmila Matyakhina, Julie Vogt, June-Anne Gold, Soo-Mi Park, Vinod Varghese, Anne K. Lampe, Ajith Kumar, Melissa Lees, Muriel Holder-Espinasse, Vivienne McConnell, Birgitta Bernhard, Ed Blair, Victoria Harrison, Donna M. Muzny, Richard A. Gibbs, Sarah H. Elsea, Jennifer E. Posey, Weimin Bi, Seema Lalani, Fan Xia, Yaping Yang, Christine M. Eng, James R. Lupski, Pengfei Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Psychology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 29 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,157,072
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,266
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,719
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.