You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Atkins, Martin Eccles, Signe Flottorp, Gordon H Guyatt, David Henry, Suzanne Hill, Alessandro Liberati, Dianne O'Connell, Andrew D Oxman, Bob Phillips, Holger Schünemann, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer, Gunn E Vist, John W Williams, The GRADE Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 496 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 96 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 149 | 28% |
| Unknown | 79 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 231 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 9% |
| Psychology | 22 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 77 | 15% |
| Unknown | 121 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,068,027
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#749
of 8,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,918
of 156,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.