You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0698-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tanja Rombey, Katharina Allers, Tim Mathes, Falk Hoffmann, Dawid Pieper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Germany | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
Librarian | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,316,221
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#358
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,793
of 351,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.