↓ Skip to main content

Students’ perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Students’ perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1512-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timm C. Schott, Rahima Arsalan, Katja Weimer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 52 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 55 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,801
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,087
of 351,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#54
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.