You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High resolution, 3-dimensional Ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance venography in central venous occlusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0528-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Puja Shahrouki, John M. Moriarty, Sarah N. Khan, Biraj Bista, Stephen T. Kee, Brian G. DeRubertis, Takegawa Yoshida, Kim-Lien Nguyen, J. Paul Finn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,608,104
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#280
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,816
of 366,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.