You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alicia O’Cathain, Liz Croot, Katie Sworn, Edward Duncan, Nikki Rousseau, Katrina Turner, Lucy Yardley, Pat Hoddinott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 82 | 47% |
Ireland | 13 | 7% |
Australia | 7 | 4% |
United States | 6 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Guinea | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 59 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 80 | 46% |
Members of the public | 71 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 553 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 17% |
Researcher | 87 | 16% |
Student > Master | 63 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
Other | 91 | 16% |
Unknown | 162 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 91 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 51 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 2% |
Other | 66 | 12% |
Unknown | 199 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#366,357
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#6
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,210
of 368,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.