↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
175 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia O’Cathain, Liz Croot, Katie Sworn, Edward Duncan, Nikki Rousseau, Katrina Turner, Lucy Yardley, Pat Hoddinott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 553 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 17%
Researcher 87 16%
Student > Master 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 91 16%
Unknown 162 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 12%
Social Sciences 51 9%
Sports and Recreations 13 2%
Other 66 12%
Unknown 199 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#366,357
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#6
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,210
of 368,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.