You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating in vivo efficacy – toxicity profile of TEG001 in humanized mice xenografts against primary human AML disease and healthy hematopoietic cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40425-019-0558-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Inez Johanna, Trudy Straetemans, Sabine Heijhuurs, Tineke Aarts-Riemens, Håkan Norell, Laura Bongiovanni, Alain de Bruin, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 15% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,747,619
of 24,076,951 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,818
of 3,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,687
of 355,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#65
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,076,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.