↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating in vivo efficacy – toxicity profile of TEG001 in humanized mice xenografts against primary human AML disease and healthy hematopoietic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating in vivo efficacy – toxicity profile of TEG001 in humanized mice xenografts against primary human AML disease and healthy hematopoietic cells
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-019-0558-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inez Johanna, Trudy Straetemans, Sabine Heijhuurs, Tineke Aarts-Riemens, Håkan Norell, Laura Bongiovanni, Alain de Bruin, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 36 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,342,420
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,385
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,771
of 364,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#51
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.