You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies using secondary health care databases: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0695-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillermo Prada-Ramallal, Bahi Takkouche, Adolfo Figueiras |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 27% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,672,100
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#578
of 2,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,769
of 357,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.