You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decrease of energy spilling in Escherichia coli continuous cultures with rising specific growth rate and carbon wasting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-5-106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaspar Valgepea, Kaarel Adamberg, Raivo Vilu |
| Abstract |
Growth substrates, aerobic/anaerobic conditions, specific growth rate (μ) etc. strongly influence Escherichia coli cell physiology in terms of cell size, biomass composition, gene and protein expression. To understand the regulation behind these different phenotype properties, it is useful to know carbon flux patterns in the metabolic network which are generally calculated by metabolic flux analysis (MFA). However, rarely is biomass composition determined and carbon balance carefully measured in the same experiments which could possibly lead to distorted MFA results and questionable conclusions. Therefore, we carried out both detailed carbon balance and biomass composition analysis in the same experiments for more accurate quantitative analysis of metabolism and MFA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Estonia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 29% |
| Researcher | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 22% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,153,989
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#1,010
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,399
of 116,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#32
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.