↓ Skip to main content

The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Harling, Michael M. Chanda, Katrina F. Ortblad, Magdalene Mwale, Steven Chongo, Catherine Kanchele, Nyambe Kamungoma, Leah G. Barresi, Till Bärnighausen, Catherine E. Oldenburg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 61 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Psychology 13 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 65 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,576,437
of 24,773,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#191
of 2,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,029
of 357,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#13
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,773,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.