You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal heterogeneity in glioblastoma: moving targets in recurrent versus primary tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-1846-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niklas Schäfer, Gerrit H. Gielen, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Sied Kebir, Andreas Till, Roman Reinartz, Matthias Simon, Pitt Niehusmann, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Ulrich Herrlinger, Torsten Pietsch, Björn Scheffler, Martin Glas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,013,648
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,789
of 4,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,759
of 351,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#36
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.