↓ Skip to main content

The resource group method in severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative multiple case study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The resource group method in severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative multiple case study
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13033-019-0270-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathelijn D. Tjaden, Cornelis L. Mulder, Jaap van Weeghel, Philippe Delespaul, Rene Keet, Stynke Castelein, Jenny Boumans, Eva Leeman, Ulf Malm, Hans Kroon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,443,511
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#503
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,942
of 350,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.