↓ Skip to main content

Putative endothelial progenitor cells do not promote vascular repair but attenuate pericyte–myofibroblast transition in UUO-induced renal fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Putative endothelial progenitor cells do not promote vascular repair but attenuate pericyte–myofibroblast transition in UUO-induced renal fibrosis
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13287-019-1201-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Yang, Meng Wang, Fengming Zhu, Jie Sun, Huzi Xu, Octavia Li-Sien Chong Lee Shin, Zhi Zhao, Guangchang Pei, Han Zhu, Chujin Cao, Xiaofeng He, Yi Huang, Zufu Ma, Liu Liu, Le Wang, Yong Ning, Wei Liu, Gang Xu, Xiaohui Wang, Rui Zeng, Ying Yao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,673,707
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,757
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,051
of 351,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#38
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.