You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A genome triplication associated with early diversification of the core eudicots
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuannian Jiao, Jim Leebens-Mack, Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam, John E Bowers, Michael R McKain, Joel McNeal, Megan Rolf, Daniel R Ruzicka, Eric Wafula, Norman J Wickett, Xiaolei Wu, Yong Zhang, Jun Wang, Yeting Zhang, Eric J Carpenter, Michael K Deyholos, Toni M Kutchan, Andre S Chanderbali, Pamela S Soltis, Dennis W Stevenson, Richard McCombie, J Chris Pires, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Douglas E Soltis, Claude W dePamphilis |
Abstract |
Although it is agreed that a major polyploidy event, gamma, occurred within the eudicots, the phylogenetic placement of the event remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Belgium | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 2% |
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 250 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 25% |
Researcher | 56 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 6% |
Student > Master | 17 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 18% |
Unknown | 47 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 58% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 2% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 3% |
Unknown | 53 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,483,362
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,479
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,130
of 252,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.