↓ Skip to main content

Adding a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to the UK cervical cancer screening programme: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adding a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to the UK cervical cancer screening programme: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-6-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shalini L Kulasingam, Steve Benard, Ruanne V Barnabas, Nathalie Largeron, Evan R Myers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 120 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 14%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#357
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,609
of 174,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.