↓ Skip to main content

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-5-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Atkins, Peter A Briss, Martin Eccles, Signe Flottorp, Gordon H Guyatt, Robin T Harbour, Suzanne Hill, Roman Jaeschke, Alessandro Liberati, Nicola Magrini, James Mason, Dianne O'Connell, Andrew D Oxman, Bob Phillips, Holger Schünemann, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer, Gunn E Vist, John W Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 3 1%
Austria 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 174 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Professor 15 7%
Other 60 30%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 30 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,678,719
of 21,323,625 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#619
of 7,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,176
of 278,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,323,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them