In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols (n=95) and the published results (n=143) were found in 61% of cases. Such studies carried a risk of results being misinterpreted due to inadequate or misleading information. [x-post from /r/science] User chalky109, in the Capitalism in Decay subreddit, 21 Feb 2016
In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols (n=95) and the published results (n=143) were found in 61% of cases. Such studies carried a risk of results being misinterpreted due to inadequate or misleading information. User worldnewsbot, in the News From Around The World subreddit, 21 Feb 2016
In a follow-up of Danish clinical drug trials, inconsistencies between original research protocols (n=95) and the published results (n=143) were found in 61% of cases. Such studies carried a risk of results being misinterpreted due to inadequate or misleading information. User TheDrCK, in the Reddit Science subreddit, 21 Feb 2016