↓ Skip to main content

SNP discovery and genetic mapping using genotyping by sequencing of whole genome genomic DNA from a pea RIL population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SNP discovery and genetic mapping using genotyping by sequencing of whole genome genomic DNA from a pea RIL population
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2447-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilles Boutet, Susete Alves Carvalho, Matthieu Falque, Pierre Peterlongo, Emeline Lhuillier, Olivier Bouchez, Clément Lavaud, Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel, Nathalie Rivière, Alain Baranger

Abstract

Progress in genetics and breeding in pea still suffers from the limited availability of molecular resources. SNP markers that can be identified through affordable sequencing processes, without the need for prior genome reduction or a reference genome to assemble sequencing data would allow the discovery and genetic mapping of thousands of molecular markers. Such an approach could significantly speed up genetic studies and marker assisted breeding for non-model species. A total of 419,024 SNPs were discovered using HiSeq whole genome sequencing of four pea lines, followed by direct identification of SNP markers without assembly using the discoSnp tool. Subsequent filtering led to the identification of 131,850 highly designable SNPs, polymorphic between at least two of the four pea lines. A subset of 64,754 SNPs was called and genotyped by short read sequencing on a subpopulation of 48 RILs from the cross 'Baccara' x 'PI180693'. This data was used to construct a WGGBS-derived pea genetic map comprising 64,263 markers. This map is collinear with previous pea consensus maps and therefore with the Medicago truncatula genome. Sequencing of four additional pea lines showed that 33 % to 64 % of the mapped SNPs, depending on the pairs of lines considered, are polymorphic and can therefore be useful in other crosses. The subsequent genotyping of a subset of 1000 SNPs, chosen for their mapping positions using a KASP™ assay, showed that almost all generated SNPs are highly designable and that most (95 %) deliver highly qualitative genotyping results. Using rather low sequencing coverages in SNP discovery and in SNP inferring did not hinder the identification of hundreds of thousands of high quality SNPs. The development and optimization of appropriate tools in SNP discovery and genetic mapping have allowed us to make available a massive new genomic resource in pea. It will be useful for both fine mapping within chosen QTL confidence intervals and marker assisted breeding for important traits in pea improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 18%
Computer Science 5 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,787,961
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,570
of 10,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,679
of 298,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#212
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.