You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 'whole systems' model of self-management support for the management of long- term conditions in primary care: trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Bower, Anne Kennedy, David Reeves, Anne Rogers, Tom Blakeman, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Robert Bowen, Martin Eden, Caroline Gardner, Mark Hann, Victoria Lee, Rebecca Morris, Joanne Protheroe, Gerry Richardson, Caroline Sanders, Angela Swallow, David Thompson |
| Abstract |
Patients with long-term conditions are increasingly the focus of quality improvement activities in health services to reduce the impact of these conditions on quality of life and to reduce the burden on care utilisation. There is significant interest in the potential for self-management support to improve health and reduce utilisation in these patient populations, but little consensus concerning the optimal model that would best provide such support. We describe the implementation and evaluation of self-management support through an evidence-based 'whole systems' model involving patient support, training for primary care teams, and service re-organisation, all integrated into routine delivery within primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 370 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 22% |
| Unknown | 79 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 12% |
| Psychology | 23 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,495,725
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,187
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,821
of 253,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.