You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation of immune gene signatures in solid tumors and prognostic implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-016-2948-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Chifman, Ashok Pullikuth, Jeff W. Chou, Davide Bedognetti, Lance D. Miller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,101
of 8,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,218
of 416,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,387 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.