↓ Skip to main content

The translation research in a dental setting (TRiaDS) programme protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The translation research in a dental setting (TRiaDS) programme protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan E Clarkson, Craig R Ramsay, Martin P Eccles, Sandra Eldridge, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Marie Johnston, Susan Michie, Shaun Treweek, Alan Walker, Linda Young, Irene Black, Debbie Bonetti, Heather Cassie, Jill Francis, Gillian MacKenzie, Lorna MacPherson, Lorna McKee, Nigel Pitts, Jim Rennie, Doug Stirling, Colin Tilley, Carole Torgerson, Luke Vale

Abstract

It is well documented that the translation of knowledge into clinical practice is a slow and haphazard process. This is no less true for dental healthcare than other types of healthcare. One common policy strategy to help promote knowledge translation is the production of clinical guidance, but it has been demonstrated that the simple publication of guidance is unlikely to optimise practice. Additional knowledge translation interventions have been shown to be effective, but effectiveness varies and much of this variation is unexplained. The need for researchers to move beyond single studies to develop a generalisable, theory based, knowledge translation framework has been identified.For dentistry in Scotland, the production of clinical guidance is the responsibility of the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP). TRiaDS (Translation Research in a Dental Setting) is a multidisciplinary research collaboration, embedded within the SDCEP guidance development process, which aims to establish a practical evaluative framework for the translation of guidance and to conduct and evaluate a programme of integrated, multi-disciplinary research to enhance the science of knowledge translation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,169,715
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,207
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,116
of 95,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.