You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors influencing integration of TB services in general hospitals in two regions of China: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guanyang Zou, Xiaolin Wei, John D Walley, Jia Yin, Qiang Sun |
Abstract |
In the majority of China, the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) at the county level provides both clinical and public health care for TB cases, with hospitals and other health facilities referring suspected TB cases to the CDC. In recent years, an integrated model has emerged, where the CDC remains the basic management unit for TB control, while a general hospital is designated to provide clinical care for TB patients. This study aims to explore the factors that influence the integration of TB services in general hospitals and generate knowledge to aid the scale-up of integration of TB services in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2012.
All research outputs
#13,662,490
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,771
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,370
of 246,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#35
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.