↓ Skip to main content

PIK3CA alterations and benefit with neratinib: analysis from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III ExteNET trial

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PIK3CA alterations and benefit with neratinib: analysis from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III ExteNET trial
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13058-019-1115-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen K. L. Chia, Miguel Martin, Frankie A. Holmes, Bent Ejlertsen, Suzette Delaloge, Beverly Moy, Hiroji Iwata, Gunter von Minckwitz, Janine Mansi, Carlos H. Barrios, Michael Gnant, Zorica Tomašević, Neelima Denduluri, Robert Šeparović, Sung-Bae Kim, Erik Hugger Jakobsen, Vernon Harvey, Nicholas Robert, John Smith, Graydon Harker, Bo Zhang, Lisa D. Eli, Yining Ye, Alshad S. Lalani, Marc Buyse, Arlene Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,884
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,285
of 364,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.