↓ Skip to main content

Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
554 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Mungall, Carlo Torniai, Georgios V Gkoutos, Suzanna E Lewis, Melissa A Haendel

Abstract

We present Uberon, an integrated cross-species ontology consisting of over 6,500 classes representing a variety of anatomical entities, organized according to traditional anatomical classification criteria. The ontology represents structures in a species-neutral way and includes extensive associations to existing species-centric anatomical ontologies, allowing integration of model organism and human data. Uberon provides a necessary bridge between anatomical structures in different taxa for cross-species inference. It uses novel methods for representing taxonomic variation, and has proved to be essential for translational phenotype analyses. Uberon is available at http://uberon.org.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 7%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 279 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 97 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 18%
Student > Master 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Professor 16 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 38%
Computer Science 46 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 51 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,445,880
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,157
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,604
of 253,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.