↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-415
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A St John, Edward L Braun, Sally R Isberg, Lee G Miles, Amanda Y Chong, Jaime Gongora, Pauline Dalzell, Christopher Moran, Bertrand Bed'Hom, Arkhat Abzhanov, Shane C Burgess, Amanda M Cooksey, Todd A Castoe, Nicholas G Crawford, Llewellyn D Densmore, Jennifer C Drew, Scott V Edwards, Brant C Faircloth, Matthew K Fujita, Matthew J Greenwold, Federico G Hoffmann, Jonathan M Howard, Taisen Iguchi, Daniel E Janes, Shahid Yar Khan, Satomi Kohno, AP Jason de Koning, Stacey L Lance, Fiona M McCarthy, John E McCormack, Mark E Merchant, Daniel G Peterson, David D Pollock, Nader Pourmand, Brian J Raney, Kyria A Roessler, Jeremy R Sanford, Roger H Sawyer, Carl J Schmidt, Eric W Triplett, Tracey D Tuberville, Miryam Venegas-Anaya, Jason T Howard, Erich D Jarvis, Louis J Guillette, Travis C Glenn, Richard E Green, David A Ray

Abstract

The International Crocodilian Genomes Working Group (ICGWG) will sequence and assemble the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) and Indian gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) genomes. The status of these projects and our planned analyses are described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 283 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 21%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 8%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 35 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Environmental Science 8 3%
Computer Science 6 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 41 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,276,679
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#982
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,260
of 253,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.