↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features and risk factors for severe and critical pregnant women with 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza infection in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features and risk factors for severe and critical pregnant women with 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza infection in China
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng-jun Zhang, Xiao-li Li, Bin Cao, Shi-gui Yang, Li-rong Liang, Li Gu, Zhen Xu, Ke Hu, Hong-yuan Zhang, Xi-xin Yan, Wen-bao Huang, Wei Chen, Jing-xiao Zhang, Lan-juan Li, Chen Wang, for the National Influenza A Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Clinical Investigation Group of China

Abstract

2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) influenza posed an increased risk of severe illness among pregnant women. Data on risk factors associated with death of pregnant women and neonates with pH1N1 infections are limited outside of developed countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,061
of 7,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,007
of 247,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#40
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.