↓ Skip to main content

The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Women's Health, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-8-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke Mol, Annika Strandell, Davor Jurkovic, Tamer Yalcinkaya, Harold R Verhoeve, Carolien AM Koks, Paul JQ van der Linden, Giuseppe CM Graziosi, Andreas L Thurkow, Annemieke Hoek, Lars Hogström, Ingemar Klinte, Kerstin Nilsson, Norah M van Mello, Willem M Ankum, Fulco van der Veen, Ben WM Mol, Petra J Hajenius

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 50%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,390,600
of 21,435,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,112
of 1,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,703
of 278,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,435,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them