↓ Skip to main content

Deaths of cyclists in london: trends from 1992 to 2006

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deaths of cyclists in london: trends from 1992 to 2006
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrei S Morgan, Helen B Dale, William E Lee, Phil J Edwards

Abstract

Cycling is an increasingly important mode of transport for environmental and health reasons. Cycling fatalities in London were previously investigated in 1994 using routinely collected data. Since then, there have been shifts in the modes of transport used, and in transport policies. We sought to replicate the previous work using data on cyclist deaths in London between 1992 and 2006, specifically investigating whether heavy goods vehicles continued to pose a threat.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Engineering 10 10%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,364,609
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,151
of 17,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,033
of 110,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#29
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.