↓ Skip to main content

A study of reproducibility of kinesiology tape applications: review, reliability and validity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study of reproducibility of kinesiology tape applications: review, reliability and validity
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12891-019-2533-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Selva, Alberto Pardo, Xavier Aguado, Ignacio Montava, Luis Gil-Santos, Carlos Barrios

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 33 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Sports and Recreations 9 10%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,290,814
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,835
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,484
of 352,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#45
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.